Editor's ChoiceCategories Credit Type Issuers Blog

Credit Card Debt Still Down, And Cards Get Safer

11/09/2010

Call it a phenomenon of this recession, but people are continuing to turn away from credit card debt.   Consumer reports cites the latest monthly report from the Federal Reserve Bank. The causes are said to be a combination of tighter lending as well as consumer’s reluctance to get into credit card debt.

I Call It Good News

Americans have been gorging on too much debt for too long.  Credit cards aren’t going away, they are just becoming slightly less available to those who are the least likely to pay back the debt.   Consumers facing uncertain economic times are reluctant to rack up the debt as well.   It’s about time.  I hate to sound like an old coot, but we do need to go back to the time when a credit card was earned only after one established a responsible credit history.   I am a big believer in credit cards, but only as a method of payment.   I am completely opposed to using credit cards as a method of finance, i.e., incurring debt on your credit card.

Credit Cards Continue To Get Safer

Personally, I find the CARD Act to be one of the most under appreciated accomplishments of the Obama administration.   This legislation went nowhere under George W. Bush and the Republican held Congress, yet it was signed into law early in President Obama’s term.   This is a landmark piece of consumer protection legislation, yet it was always apparent that the banks would exploit any and all loopholes in the bill.     The banks kept plugging away at their goal of exploiting consumers for profit, just like a torrential downpour finds it’s way through a leaky roof.  Fortunately, the Federal Reserve Bank is moving aggressively to close these loopholes.   In it’s latest announcement, they issued new rule that will curtail fee harvesting credit cards, “rebate” cards, and the practice of considering household income rather than the individual borrower’s income.

The idea is that fee harvesters have gotten around the CARD Act’s rules on charging cardholders excessive fees by charging a processing fees to applicants who are not yet cardholders.    Rebate cards attempt to get around rules regulating finance charges by offering refunds that could be revoked at whim.    By looking at household income, banks were doubtlessly getting around all sorts of rules in order to attempt to saddle people with debt that they couldn’t afford, on the hopes that other family members will bail them out.

It is good to see the Fed take an aggressive stance when it comes to tweaking the rules in order to make sure that banks are complying with the spirit of the CARD Act, not just the letter.

There is a lot of anti-government sentiment out there, but here is a fine example of our government looking out for the interests of it’s citizens.   The idea of overbearing rules and regulations infuriates many, but it is the actions of the banks that ensure that we will always need regulations.   You could even think of the regulators like the referees in football or even hockey.  Without their presence, chaos would rein and injuries would be frequent.

Blue Sky Vs Discover Escape vs Discover Miles?

Update – The cards from Discover analyzed here (Miles and Escape) are no longer offered by Discover.

Here is a recent reader question.

I haven’t seen many or any comparison between these three cards.

I currently have a Chase Freedom card through Visa but am looking to get a second card, probably one with a nice return. Here is how I assessed the three:

(1) American Express Blue Sky: Like it because of the absence of an annual fee, the 1.33% return and the consumer protections offered by Amex.

(2) Discover Escape: I also am really attracted to this card for it’s 2% reward (one of the best in the business) but am unsure about the $60 annual fee.

(3) Discover Miles: I didn’t really consider the card until I factored in the $3,000 double miles bonus every year and the fact that it has no annual fee.

Can you provide any other pros/cons and recommendations based on these cards? Right now I am leaning towards Discover Escape but I wasn’t sure how much I would need to spend to really make the annual fee worth the investment.

Seth

Answer – Seth, I think you have clearly spelled out the pros and cons of each card. But let me summaries again.

Blue Sky from American Express(R) – Here are the following pros and cons of the Blue Sky.

Escape by Discover® Card – Here is what I like and dislike about this card.

Blue Sky(SM) Preferred from American Express. This card allows you to earn double points for dining, hotel, and car rental purchases. You are also given a $100 allowance for airline baggages! The annual fee is $75. Once again, you can breakdown your spending and figure if this card is better than either the regular Blue Sky or the 2 Discover Cards.

The following is the equation I would use for the Blue Sky Preferred Version to determine if it is better than any of the other cards.

(X minus Hotel + Dining + Car Rental) + (2*(Hotel Spending + Dining + Car Rental)) – (7500 = annual fee equivalent) + (10,000 = $100 baggage allowance).

I hope this will help your decision. The most important factor is how much you spend on the card.

Can I Get a Credit Card in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy?

11/08/2010

I am currently in Chapter 13 bankruptcy and I am wondering if there is a credit card company that would provide a credit card so that I might re-establish my credit. – Beth

ANSWER

Beth:

While in Chapter 13 bankruptcy, you are prohibited from acquiring any new debt without the permission of the Bankruptcy Judge or Trustee. New debt or loans are generally not approved unless they are proven to be essential, for another car when yours has broken down or for new student loans, for example.

That being said, you will have offers for loans and credit cards even though your Chapter 13 hasn’t been discharged. You will also hear of people acquiring new debt during their Chapter 13 because rarely will the Trustee or Judge find out about it. The problem is if, somehow, they do find out that you have acquired new debt without the permission of the court, you are in jeopardy of having your bankruptcy dismissed without a discharge and the payments you have made so far will basically count as nothing. If your case is dismissed you will then be responsible for the debt and remaining balances you have with the creditors.

Loan companies and creditors do occasionally flood new Chapter 13 filers with offers because they know that you won’t be able to file Chapter 13 again for another 2 years. It may seem difficult to wait, and you may feel as though you won’t get any credit after your bankruptcy is discharged or you’d like to start reestablishing your credit as soon as possible. You will acquire credit again, but it’s best to wait for the discharge than to risk the work and payments you’ve already put into your current Chapter 13.

Radio City Christmas Spectacular – 25% Off With Chase Freedom

11/07/2010

Cardholders of Chase Freedom will be able to get exclusive ticket packages and 25% discounts for the Radio City Christmas Spectacular Show this season. In fact, you can also meet the world famous Rockettes prior to the show! So if taking your kids to the Radio City Show is on your plans this season and you have a Chase Freedom, I suggest you use it to get some good discounts. These discounts are applicable to the Radio City Show in all cities.

Chase Freedom® Visa - $100 Bonus Cash Back

Related Post

Chase Freedom&#174 Visa – $100 Bonus Cash Back review.

Why This Is A Bad Time To Churn Credit Cards

11/05/2010

Churning credit cards is the slang for opening up numerous accounts for the purpose of obtaining sign up bonuses.   These sign up bonuses can be very valuable.   I have profited immensely from sign up bonuses in the last few years, but now I am going cold turkey for a while.

Why Stop Now

The reason is simple.   Mortgage interest rates are at all time record lows, and I want to maintain the highest credit score possible.   Yes, I plan on refinancing, but not until the rates drop even lower.   This week, the Federal Reserve Bank announced that they will be ing up Treasury bonds in an effort to reduce long term interest rates.   Currently, I could refinance my 30 year mortgage to a 15 year and save about 1.5% interest.   My payment will go up about 25%, but if I can swing it, I will have our house paid off before my first child goes to college!    What I am planning on doing is waiting a little bit longer until interest rates are even lower.   With patience, I am hoping to refinance to a 15 year mortgage and keep my monthly payment very close to what it is now.

What Is The Effect Of Churning On My Credit Score?

It is not much, but I am going to play it very safe in the coming months.    Every time you apply for a credit card, it creates a small hit on your credit score called hard pull.    That means that someone looked at your credit for the purpose of granting you a loan.   The idea is that if you are applying for loans all over the place, that might be a signal that you are in financial difficulty, so your credit score drops temporarily.    Furthermore, opening and closing accounts reduces your average credit history.   Again, both of these are very minor factors in your overall credit score.   They are a drop in the bucket compared to your utilization ration and your payment history.   Considering that your mortgage rate will vary based on your credit score, no handful of frequent flier miles is worth even a small increase in my mortgage payment for the next 15 years.

Quantas Grounds The A380, A Pilot's Perspective

11/04/2010

The Airbus A380 is widely regarded in aviation as a technical achievement, yet a financial disaster.    Airbus has successfully built the largest passenger aircraft in the world, yet sold a relatively few number of them.   Worse, production delays have meant that a precious few are being delivered every year.   In the last three years since it’s introduction to passenger service, only 38 have been delivered, out of a total of only 234 ordered.   By comparison, Boeing delivered over 160 747 aircraft in it’s first three years of production.   If Airbus delivers the remaining 196 aircraft it has on order in the next ten years, it will still have built less than half of the number of Boeing 747s than were built during the first 13 years of it’s production.

The A380 In Service

Nevertheless, there are five airlines that currently operate the aircraft, Singapore, Qantas, Emirates, Lufthansa, and Air France.     These airlines seemed pleased with the aircraft and it’s anemic sales have been blamed on a smaller than expected market for aircraft seating over 500 passengers, as well as it’s limited cargo capacity.   Passengers love the airplane.  With it’s spacious aisles and headroom to it’s near silent cabin, people often go out of their way to book a flight on this plane.

While I have not yet had the privilege of flying on this plane, I was fortunate enough to see a demonstration of it’s capabilities last year at the Airventure gathering in Oshkosh Wisconsin.   It was an impressive demonstration, despite the hard landing I witnessed during a challenging crosswind.

The A380 Out Of Service

On November 4th, 2010, an A380 operated by Qantas experienced an engine failure on departure from Singapore, enroute to Sydney.     With jet engines, there are two types of failures, contained and contained.    Contained engine failures are the most common as well as the least serious.   This is when the engine shuts down without any parts protruding from the engine shroud, called a nacelle.    Parts may come loose or be ejected safely from the tail pipe, yet the failure is still considered “contained.    For example, US Airways flight 1549, the “miracle on the Hudson” experienced the contained engine failure of both of its engines after they ingested birds.

By contrast, an uncontained engine failure is a very rare and serious event.  In an uncontained engine failure, the fan blades or other components come loose at a velocity sufficient  to exit the side of the engine, possibly penetrating the cabin or damaging other parts of the aircraft.  Aircraft are designed to withstand an uncontained failure as much as is feasible, yet they can still cause enough damage to take down an airplane.   For example, on July 19, 1989 United flight 232 experienced an uncontained engine failure that severed the hydraulics that control the aircraft.   While the pilots used the thrust of the engines to steer the airplane and attempt a landing in Souix City Iowa, a crash occurred, killing 172 of the 285 people on board.

The A380 incident was an uncontained engine failure, with parts of the engine nacelle falling on a populated area.   There are even pictures of the wing that appear to have an engine piece protruding through it.    Thankfully, the aircraft landed safely and no one was injured.   In response, Qantas has grounded its entire fleet of aircraft, snarling its schedule for thousands of passengers.

Should You Be Concerned?

First, it is important to know that there are essentially two kinds of A380s flying.   Some have the Rolls Royce Trent engines, and some have powerplants from Engine Alliance, and consortium of General Electric and Pratt & Whitney.   All Qantas aircraft have the Trent engines, as do the A380s of Singapore and Lufthansa.     As of this writing, Singapore is temporarily suspending A380 operations, while Lufthansa is performing safety checks, but is still not halting operations.   Air France and Emirates fly the version with engines from Engine Alliance.

You can think of a jet engine kind of like the lens on a high end camera.   Aircraft are ordered from the airframe manufacturer, but the engines, like camera lenses, are considered a separate purchase.    Failure of one manufacturer’s engine is not relevant to the operation of another manufacturer’s engine.   If you or someone you know is planning on flying an Air France or Emirates, A380, this event is completely inconsequential to the safety of their flight.

If I was considering flying an A380 of Lufthansa, Singapore, or even Qantas, I still would not give it a second thought.   It so happens that these three airlines are among the safest in the world.    For example, Qantas has never had a fatality on a jet aircraft, and it has been nearly sixty years since they have had any fatality at all.   The fact that the most recent incident, though serious, resulted in no injuries or loss of life is a testament to the safety of the A380 and the professionalism of the crew.   By grounding their A380 aircraft fleet, Qantas is going out of their way to ensure that their safety record remains immaculate.   When they decide to restart A380 operations, I would be glad to be a passenger.

Why I Book Travel Direct

11/03/2010

Priceline is a great idea, made famous by snappy commercials.    It seems to work for many people, but not for me.   Here is why:

1. My Vacation Time Is Very Valuable. I don’t get off many days of the year, and I like to take a lot of vacations.    What that means is that I tend to schedule my vacation very closely around my work.   It is not unusual for me to leave work at four in the afternoon for a 6:00 P.M. flight, so that I can spend the entire first day of my vacation at my destination rather than traveling.   When you book a flight on Priceline, you have no idea what time of day you will travel or even if you will change planes.   There is nothing to stop them from giving you a six hour layover somewhere.   Worse, you could change planes in an inconvenient location, spending your day in the air.   If I have to change planes, I want to know how long and where that will be.

2. I Am Particular About Which Airlines I Fly. Frankly, some airlines are just not worth the trouble.  I have had so many bad experiences with United Airlines, that I have determined that the organization provides little incentive for any of it’s employees to provide decent customer service.     Other airlines outsource their flying to small, regional airlines that are unreliable.   They often fly regional jets that are uncomfortable.   Call me an airline geek, but I want to choose what airline I am flying and what aircraft I will be in.

3. I Don’t Consider Hotels A Commodity.  Even more than airlines, knowing which hotel you are staying in is important.   I like to spend a few minutes on Trip Adviser skimming the reviews before committing to a hotel.   I don’t care how many stars someone rated a hotel, I am not staying there if it has multiple reports of dirty rooms, noisy disturbances, crime, or bedbugs.     I do want a hotel that is near to my destination.   Especially if I am not planning on renting a car, I want to know exactly where the hotel is in reference to restaurants and public transportation.

4. I Want To Know Exactly What Fees They Are Going To Charge Me. One of the biggest flaws in Priceline is their toleration of so called resort fees.   As you can read in this article at The Consumerist, there is nothing to stop Priceline from giving you a hotel at one price, and the hotel charging you a “resort fee”  that exceeds the cost of the room.    I hate these fees, and the way Priceline is ignoring them is fraudulent.

5. Booking Directly Puts You On Their Good Side. I have read too many stories about what happens to people who make reservations on Priceline or other discounters.   They show up to a hotel, and they are given the unheated room next to the elevator.    The hotel is making very little profit on these discounted rooms, and since you didn’t pick them by name, they have no incentive to see that your stay is comfortable.

6. Booking Directly Gives You More Flexibility Thankfully, most hotels still have cancellation policies that are quite flexible.    Generally, you can cancel with a full refund up until the night before, or often 6 pm on the day of arrival.    Call this built in travel insurance if your flight is canceled, or there is some other reason your trip just isn’t going to happen as planned.   As the reader in The Consumerist post found out, book with with Priceline, and they are keeping your money no matter what.

7. There Are Lots Of Really Good Deals Out There I know that people score great deals with Priceline, just like people win big in Vegas.  Nevertheless, I prefer not to gamble on my travel.   Instead, I find Best Rate Guarantees from travel providers like Expedia.    I also find other hotel deals and promotions that are quite good.   When all else fails, I have been known to negotiate directly with a property.

Conclusions

If you have plenty of extra time on your vacations, and price is your only consideration, Priceline may be for you.    If you really don’t care what kind of hotel you stay in, so long as it is rated with so many stars, you might get a deal on Priceline.   If paying resort fees of an unknown amount is acceptable to you, go ahead, give Priceline a try.    For me, I will stick with booking my travel directly with the airlines and hotels I plan on patronizing.

Susan Boyle Doesn't Need A Credit Card

According to this post from contact music, Susan Boyle, the winner of the UK 2009 Britain’s Got Talent, does not believe in using credit cards.

Despite having a reported 15 million (10 million pounds) in her bank account from the sale of her debut album, I Dreamed A Dream (sold more than 8.5 million copies), she is given only $450 (350 pounds a week) to live on. And she is happily contented and thinks this will keep her grounded. From being unemployed in 2009 to a “superstar”, this really says a lot about not letting “money get into your head”! Who says you cannot be a frugal millionaire.

But if I had $15 million, I’d earn about $150,000 gross with 1% interest in the bank. After paying taxes, that leaves about $100,000 I guess (depending on your true tax bracket). If I save 20%, that leaves me with $80,000 to spend. And I guess I would be a little more generous with myself. But hey, to each his own. Question is, how much allowance would you give yourself if you had that amount of money?

To round up this post, here’s a cut and paste (from youtube) of her Susan’s performance with Elaine Page (her idol)!

In Defence Of Dumb Cards

11/02/2010

Yesterday, I told you about how credit card companies were coming up with some innovative, if pointless technologies to include in our credit cards.     Today, I stumbled across an article that was published two weeks ago in the New York Times that seems to refute the idea of smart cards.

Why Are Dumb Cards Better?

The idea is that credit card fraud has been coming down steadily, so there really is no urgency to replace the good old magnetic strip.    Furthermore, who needs chip and PIN technology when so many gas stations terminals are already asking you for your zip code, something that is pretty easy to remember.

Who needs a radio frequency id chip so you can waive your card in front of the terminal?   The idea was that you wouldn’t have to hand over your card to be swiped, and that you wouldn’t have to sign for purchases.   In reality, most stores now let you swipe your own card, and signatures are no longer required for small purchases.

The article also explores the roots of why credit card technology in the US differs from that in Europe.   Ironically, we have less technology in our cards because we have traditionally had better technology in our communications system.  We were able to check card numbers against a central registry, while the Europeans traditionally relegated the security to the card itself.

The article talks about “pay wave” technology that will allow purchases without having to swipe or sign.    Personally, I like the idea of having to do these things before making a purchase.   The last thing we need is to make it too easy for people to use their credit cards with just the flick of their wrists.   Taking out the very little effort remaining is an induction to both fraud and overspending.

The fact is, many cards already have some version of this technology.    Take a look at the back of your American Express sometime.   There is actually a little symbol that looks like four radio waves emanating.   Occasionally, I see this symbol on card readers.   I have even tried it a few times, and it only worked once, so I never bothered again.    The fact that most people aren’t even aware of this feature is further proof that no one really cares how much technology you can deploy, they just care what the tech can do for them.

Denver, A Case Study In How Competition Reduces Air Fares

This is a golden age for air travel if you are lucky enough to live in Denver.     When I moved here in 1997, Denver’s new airport had recently opened in 1995.   It was said that the grand new facility was conceived for three major airline hubs, built for two, and opened with one.   During the time it took to design and build the airport, Western airlines was absorbed by Delta and it’s Denver hub was closed, and Continental chose to abandon it’s Denver hub at the old Stapleton Airport rather than move to the new field.    When Denver International Airport (DIA) opened in 1995, only United remained as the sole carrier offering service to more than a handful of destinations.   As you can imagine, prices were high.  I once purchased a lasts minute ticket from Denver to Atlanta for $1,600 round trip.   I might have paid less  if I had flown to Sydney.  As I write this, I just searched for a trip from Denver to Atlanta leaving today and returning Thursday.   The price was just over $600.

What Changed?

Frontier Airlines grew a hub in Denver throughout the last decade.   Although they struggled, they offered lower fares to dozens of destinations around the country.   Last year, they emerged from bankruptcy when they were acquired by  Republic, the owner of Midwest.   Earlier this year, the Midwest brand was folded into Frontier.    Four years ago, Southwest Airlines began service to Denver.   Southwest aggressively expanded their Denver service, their fastest ever growth to a new city.   The result is that Denver is now the airport that was originally envisioned, one with three hubs, United, Frontier, and Southwest.

Having three hubs has a fantastic effect on prices out here.   According to the Denver Post, the average airfare from Denver has dropped by a third in the last decade. I don’t think there is much precedent for three airline hubs operating out of a single airport.    Chicago has American, United, and Southwest out of Midway.  Orlando has Southwest, Airtran, and Jetblue.  Even Milwaukee has miniature connecting operations of Southwest, Frontier, and Airtran.   In the last two of those cases, Southwest’s purchase of Airtran will shrink competition back to two major carriers.

Is It Sustainable?

How long can this situation continue.   Let’s face it, Denver is not Chicago and never will be.    On the other hand, few people realize that Atlanta has the busiest airport in the world, so these things are not intuitive.     The fact is that Denver made a huge bet 20 years ago that Denver’s location would be so ideal for connecting operations, that multiple carriers would be willing to compete with each other here.    At first, it seemed like a terrible bet, building what was at the time, the world’s largest airport in the high planes, 15 miles outside of Downtown.    Today, it seems like the bet is paying back handsome dividends  as Denver is one of the top 10 busiest airports in the world and one of the top 5 in the county.    Denver’s airport continues to grow despite the current economic downturn.

What Are The Lessons Here?

To some extent, you could say “If you build it, they will come,” but only if they have nowhere else to go.   Other airports built in major cities in the last forty years have been only moderately successful when they have had to compete with their predecessors, such as Washington Dulles and Dallas-Ft. Worth.    In the case of Atlanta, their enormous new terminal finished in 1980 has also been an overwhelming success.  Like Denver, it has no competition offering commercial service in the metropolitan area.

Another clear lesson is that competition will always benefit consumers.   When airlines merge, woe be it unto travelers who once flew a competitive route that is now dominated by a single carrier.  Keep that in mind next time there is a merger proposed between airlines, and their media people claim that the results will be good for consumers.

Privacy Policy Terms and Conditions About Me Disclosure Contact Me

Newsletter Sign Up

Name

Email